Compare-Cities.com
Compare Walla Walla to Richland
This post compares Walla Walla, Washington to Richland, Washington across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Walla Walla (city) | Richland (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 32,585 | 53,991 |
| Income (median) | $40,863 | $60,961 |
| Home Value (median) | $178,800 | $226,300 |
| White | 82% | 83% |
| Black | 2% | 1% |
| Asian | 2% | 5% |
| With Kids | 27% | 30% |
| Age (median) | 35 | 36 |
| Rentals | 42% | 35% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Walla Walla or Richland?
A: Walla Walla has a smaller population count than Richland: 32585 compared with 53991 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Walla Walla or in Richland?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Walla Walla.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Walla Walla or Richland?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in Walla Walla.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Walla Walla does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 42% for Walla Walla versus 35% for Richland.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Walla Walla may include: Hazel-Dell, Wenatchee, and Tumwater.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z