Compare-Cities.com
Compare Walla Walla to Kirkland
This post compares Walla Walla, Washington to Kirkland, Washington across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
Dimension | Walla Walla (city) | Kirkland (city) |
---|---|---|
Population | 32,585 | 86,772 |
Income (median) | $40,863 | $79,458 |
Home Value (median) | $178,800 | $522,900 |
White | 82% | 76% |
Black | 2% | 1% |
Asian | 2% | 14% |
With Kids | 27% | 29% |
Age (median) | 35 | 38 |
Rentals | 42% | 36% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Walla Walla or Kirkland?
A: Walla Walla has a much smaller population count than Kirkland: 32585 compared with 86772 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Walla Walla or in Kirkland?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Walla Walla.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Walla Walla or Kirkland?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Walla Walla.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Walla Walla does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 42% for Walla Walla versus 36% for Kirkland.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Walla Walla may include: Hazel-Dell, Wenatchee, and Tumwater.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z