Compare-Cities.com
Compare Tumwater to Lacey
This post compares Tumwater, Washington to Lacey, Washington across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Tumwater (city) | Lacey (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 22,005 | 46,655 |
| Income (median) | $55,908 | $51,201 |
| Home Value (median) | $236,400 | $243,200 |
| White | 84% | 73% |
| Black | 2% | 5% |
| Asian | 4% | 8% |
| With Kids | 30% | 32% |
| Age (median) | 37 | 35 |
| Rentals | 44% | 45% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Tumwater or Lacey?
A: Tumwater has a much smaller population count than Lacey: 22005 compared with 46655 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Tumwater or in Lacey?
A: Incomes are on average similar in Tumwater.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Tumwater or Lacey?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Tumwater.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Lacey does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 44% for Tumwater versus 45% for Lacey.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Tumwater may include: Hazel-Dell, Puyallup, and Richland.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z