Compare-Cities.com
Compare South Hill to Kirkland
This post compares South Hill, Washington to Kirkland, Washington across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | South Hill (CDP) | Kirkland (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 56,379 | 86,772 |
| Income (median) | $55,045 | $79,458 |
| Home Value (median) | $262,500 | $522,900 |
| White | 74% | 76% |
| Black | 4% | 1% |
| Asian | 6% | 14% |
| With Kids | 42% | 29% |
| Age (median) | 34 | 38 |
| Rentals | 26% | 36% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, South Hill or Kirkland?
A: South Hill has a smaller population count than Kirkland: 56379 compared with 86772 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in South Hill or in Kirkland?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in South Hill.
Q: Are homes more expensive in South Hill or Kirkland?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in South Hill.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Kirkland does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 26% for South Hill versus 36% for Kirkland.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to South Hill may include: Orchards, Frederickson, and Graham.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z