Compare-Cities.com
Compare Richland to Walla Walla
This post compares Richland, Washington to Walla Walla, Washington across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Richland (city) | Walla Walla (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 53,991 | 32,585 |
| Income (median) | $60,961 | $40,863 |
| Home Value (median) | $226,300 | $178,800 |
| White | 83% | 82% |
| Black | 1% | 2% |
| Asian | 5% | 2% |
| With Kids | 30% | 27% |
| Age (median) | 36 | 35 |
| Rentals | 35% | 42% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Richland or Walla Walla?
A: Richland has a larger population count than Walla Walla: 53991 compared with 32585 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Richland or in Walla Walla?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Richland.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Richland or Walla Walla?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Richland.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Walla Walla does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 35% for Richland versus 42% for Walla Walla.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Richland may include: Tumwater, Marysville, and Hazel-Dell.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z