Compare-Cities.com
Compare Richland to Lacey
This post compares Richland, Washington to Lacey, Washington across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Richland (city) | Lacey (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 53,991 | 46,655 |
| Income (median) | $60,961 | $51,201 |
| Home Value (median) | $226,300 | $243,200 |
| White | 83% | 73% |
| Black | 1% | 5% |
| Asian | 5% | 8% |
| With Kids | 30% | 32% |
| Age (median) | 36 | 35 |
| Rentals | 35% | 45% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Richland or Lacey?
A: Richland has a similar population count than Lacey: 53991 compared with 46655 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Richland or in Lacey?
A: Incomes are on average higher in Richland.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Richland or Lacey?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Richland.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Lacey does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 35% for Richland versus 45% for Lacey.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Richland may include: Tumwater, Marysville, and Hazel-Dell.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z