Compare-Cities.com
Compare Richland to Kent
This post compares Richland, Washington to Kent, Washington across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Richland (city) | Kent (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 53,991 | 126,561 |
| Income (median) | $60,961 | $46,225 |
| Home Value (median) | $226,300 | $284,900 |
| White | 83% | 52% |
| Black | 1% | 11% |
| Asian | 5% | 20% |
| With Kids | 30% | 36% |
| Age (median) | 36 | 34 |
| Rentals | 35% | 45% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Richland or Kent?
A: Richland has a much smaller population count than Kent: 53991 compared with 126561 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Richland or in Kent?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Richland.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Richland or Kent?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in Richland.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Kent does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 35% for Richland versus 45% for Kent.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Richland may include: Tumwater, Marysville, and Hazel-Dell.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z