Compare-Cities.com
Compare Richland to Auburn
This post compares Richland, Washington to Auburn, Washington across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
Dimension | Richland (city) | Auburn (city) |
---|---|---|
Population | 53,991 | 77,440 |
Income (median) | $60,961 | $49,985 |
Home Value (median) | $226,300 | $259,600 |
White | 83% | 68% |
Black | 1% | 4% |
Asian | 5% | 9% |
With Kids | 30% | 35% |
Age (median) | 36 | 34 |
Rentals | 35% | 41% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Richland or Auburn?
A: Richland has a smaller population count than Auburn: 53991 compared with 77440 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Richland or in Auburn?
A: Incomes are on average higher in Richland.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Richland or Auburn?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Richland.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Auburn does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 35% for Richland versus 41% for Auburn.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Richland may include: Tumwater, Marysville, and Hazel-Dell.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z