Compare-Cities.com
Compare Mukilteo to Lacey
This post compares Mukilteo, Washington to Lacey, Washington across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Mukilteo (city) | Lacey (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 21,101 | 46,655 |
| Income (median) | $80,192 | $51,201 |
| Home Value (median) | $477,300 | $243,200 |
| White | 72% | 73% |
| Black | 1% | 5% |
| Asian | 18% | 8% |
| With Kids | 30% | 32% |
| Age (median) | 44 | 35 |
| Rentals | 32% | 45% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Mukilteo or Lacey?
A: Mukilteo has a much smaller population count than Lacey: 21101 compared with 46655 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Mukilteo or in Lacey?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Mukilteo.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Mukilteo or Lacey?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Mukilteo.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Lacey does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 32% for Mukilteo versus 45% for Lacey.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Mukilteo may include: Kirkland, Kenmore, and Shoreline.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z