Compare-Cities.com
Compare Lacey to South Hill
This post compares Lacey, Washington to South Hill, Washington across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Lacey (city) | South Hill (CDP) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 46,655 | 56,379 |
| Income (median) | $51,201 | $55,045 |
| Home Value (median) | $243,200 | $262,500 |
| White | 73% | 74% |
| Black | 5% | 4% |
| Asian | 8% | 6% |
| With Kids | 32% | 42% |
| Age (median) | 35 | 34 |
| Rentals | 45% | 26% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Lacey or South Hill?
A: Lacey has a similar population count than South Hill: 46655 compared with 56379 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Lacey or in South Hill?
A: Incomes are on average similar in Lacey.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Lacey or South Hill?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Lacey.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Lacey does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 45% for Lacey versus 26% for South Hill.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Lacey may include: Auburn, Silverdale, and Mountlake-Terrace.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z