Compare-Cities.com
Compare Lacey to Sammamish
This post compares Lacey, Washington to Sammamish, Washington across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Lacey (city) | Sammamish (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 46,655 | 62,877 |
| Income (median) | $51,201 | $116,376 |
| Home Value (median) | $243,200 | $679,900 |
| White | 73% | 66% |
| Black | 5% | 0% |
| Asian | 8% | 27% |
| With Kids | 32% | 52% |
| Age (median) | 35 | 38 |
| Rentals | 45% | 13% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Lacey or Sammamish?
A: Lacey has a smaller population count than Sammamish: 46655 compared with 62877 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Lacey or in Sammamish?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Lacey.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Lacey or Sammamish?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Lacey.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Lacey does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 45% for Lacey versus 13% for Sammamish.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Lacey may include: Auburn, Silverdale, and Mountlake-Terrace.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z