Compare-Cities.com
Compare Lacey to Richland
This post compares Lacey, Washington to Richland, Washington across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Lacey (city) | Richland (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 46,655 | 53,991 |
| Income (median) | $51,201 | $60,961 |
| Home Value (median) | $243,200 | $226,300 |
| White | 73% | 83% |
| Black | 5% | 1% |
| Asian | 8% | 5% |
| With Kids | 32% | 30% |
| Age (median) | 35 | 36 |
| Rentals | 45% | 35% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Lacey or Richland?
A: Lacey has a similar population count than Richland: 46655 compared with 53991 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Lacey or in Richland?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Lacey.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Lacey or Richland?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Lacey.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Lacey does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 45% for Lacey versus 35% for Richland.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Lacey may include: Auburn, Silverdale, and Mountlake-Terrace.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z