Compare-Cities.com
Compare Lacey to Mukilteo
This post compares Lacey, Washington to Mukilteo, Washington across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Lacey (city) | Mukilteo (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 46,655 | 21,101 |
| Income (median) | $51,201 | $80,192 |
| Home Value (median) | $243,200 | $477,300 |
| White | 73% | 72% |
| Black | 5% | 1% |
| Asian | 8% | 18% |
| With Kids | 32% | 30% |
| Age (median) | 35 | 44 |
| Rentals | 45% | 32% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Lacey or Mukilteo?
A: Lacey has a larger population count than Mukilteo: 46655 compared with 21101 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Lacey or in Mukilteo?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Lacey.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Lacey or Mukilteo?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Lacey.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Lacey does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 45% for Lacey versus 32% for Mukilteo.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Lacey may include: Auburn, Silverdale, and Mountlake-Terrace.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z