Compare-Cities.com
Compare Lacey to Mountlake Terrace
This post compares Lacey, Washington to Mountlake Terrace, Washington across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
Dimension | Lacey (city) | Mountlake Terrace (city) |
---|---|---|
Population | 46,655 | 20,922 |
Income (median) | $51,201 | $49,453 |
Home Value (median) | $243,200 | $311,300 |
White | 73% | 70% |
Black | 5% | 6% |
Asian | 8% | 12% |
With Kids | 32% | 31% |
Age (median) | 35 | 36 |
Rentals | 45% | 44% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Lacey or Mountlake Terrace?
A: Lacey has a larger population count than Mountlake Terrace: 46655 compared with 20922 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Lacey or in Mountlake Terrace?
A: Incomes are on average similar in Lacey.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Lacey or Mountlake Terrace?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in Lacey.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Lacey does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 45% for Lacey versus 44% for Mountlake Terrace.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Lacey may include: Auburn, Silverdale, and Mountlake-Terrace.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z