Compare-Cities.com

Compare Lacey to Kirkland

This post compares Lacey, Washington to Kirkland, Washington across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.

Dimension Lacey (city) Kirkland (city)
Population 46,655 86,772
Income (median) $51,201 $79,458
Home Value (median) $243,200 $522,900
White 73% 76%
Black 5% 1%
Asian 8% 14%
With Kids 32% 29%
Age (median) 35 38
Rentals 45% 36%

Questions and Answers:

Q: Which is more populated, Lacey or Kirkland?
A: Lacey has a smaller population count than Kirkland: 46655 compared with 86772 total people.

Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Lacey or in Kirkland?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Lacey.

Q: Are homes more expensive in Lacey or Kirkland?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Lacey.

Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Lacey does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 45% for Lacey versus 36% for Kirkland.

Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Lacey may include: Auburn, Silverdale, and Mountlake-Terrace.

The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.

City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z