Compare-Cities.com
Compare Lacey to Kent
This post compares Lacey, Washington to Kent, Washington across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Lacey (city) | Kent (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 46,655 | 126,561 |
| Income (median) | $51,201 | $46,225 |
| Home Value (median) | $243,200 | $284,900 |
| White | 73% | 52% |
| Black | 5% | 11% |
| Asian | 8% | 20% |
| With Kids | 32% | 36% |
| Age (median) | 35 | 34 |
| Rentals | 45% | 45% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Lacey or Kent?
A: Lacey has a much smaller population count than Kent: 46655 compared with 126561 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Lacey or in Kent?
A: Incomes are on average higher in Lacey.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Lacey or Kent?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Lacey.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Lacey does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 45% for Lacey versus 45% for Kent.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Lacey may include: Auburn, Silverdale, and Mountlake-Terrace.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z