Compare-Cities.com
Compare Lacey to Auburn
This post compares Lacey, Washington to Auburn, Washington across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Lacey (city) | Auburn (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 46,655 | 77,440 |
| Income (median) | $51,201 | $49,985 |
| Home Value (median) | $243,200 | $259,600 |
| White | 73% | 68% |
| Black | 5% | 4% |
| Asian | 8% | 9% |
| With Kids | 32% | 35% |
| Age (median) | 35 | 34 |
| Rentals | 45% | 41% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Lacey or Auburn?
A: Lacey has a smaller population count than Auburn: 46655 compared with 77440 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Lacey or in Auburn?
A: Incomes are on average similar in Lacey.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Lacey or Auburn?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Lacey.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Lacey does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 45% for Lacey versus 41% for Auburn.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Lacey may include: Auburn, Silverdale, and Mountlake-Terrace.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z