Compare-Cities.com
Compare Kirkland to Walla Walla
This post compares Kirkland, Washington to Walla Walla, Washington across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Kirkland (city) | Walla Walla (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 86,772 | 32,585 |
| Income (median) | $79,458 | $40,863 |
| Home Value (median) | $522,900 | $178,800 |
| White | 76% | 82% |
| Black | 1% | 2% |
| Asian | 14% | 2% |
| With Kids | 29% | 27% |
| Age (median) | 38 | 35 |
| Rentals | 36% | 42% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Kirkland or Walla Walla?
A: Kirkland has a larger population count than Walla Walla: 86772 compared with 32585 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Kirkland or in Walla Walla?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Kirkland.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Kirkland or Walla Walla?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in Kirkland.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Walla Walla does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 36% for Kirkland versus 42% for Walla Walla.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Kirkland may include: Kenmore, Bothell, and Issaquah.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z