Compare-Cities.com
Compare Kirkland to South Hill
This post compares Kirkland, Washington to South Hill, Washington across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Kirkland (city) | South Hill (CDP) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 86,772 | 56,379 |
| Income (median) | $79,458 | $55,045 |
| Home Value (median) | $522,900 | $262,500 |
| White | 76% | 74% |
| Black | 1% | 4% |
| Asian | 14% | 6% |
| With Kids | 29% | 42% |
| Age (median) | 38 | 34 |
| Rentals | 36% | 26% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Kirkland or South Hill?
A: Kirkland has a larger population count than South Hill: 86772 compared with 56379 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Kirkland or in South Hill?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Kirkland.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Kirkland or South Hill?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Kirkland.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Kirkland does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 36% for Kirkland versus 26% for South Hill.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Kirkland may include: Kenmore, Bothell, and Issaquah.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z