Compare-Cities.com
Compare Kirkland to Mountlake Terrace
This post compares Kirkland, Washington to Mountlake Terrace, Washington across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Kirkland (city) | Mountlake Terrace (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 86,772 | 20,922 |
| Income (median) | $79,458 | $49,453 |
| Home Value (median) | $522,900 | $311,300 |
| White | 76% | 70% |
| Black | 1% | 6% |
| Asian | 14% | 12% |
| With Kids | 29% | 31% |
| Age (median) | 38 | 36 |
| Rentals | 36% | 44% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Kirkland or Mountlake Terrace?
A: Kirkland has a much larger population count than Mountlake Terrace: 86772 compared with 20922 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Kirkland or in Mountlake Terrace?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Kirkland.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Kirkland or Mountlake Terrace?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Kirkland.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Mountlake Terrace does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 36% for Kirkland versus 44% for Mountlake Terrace.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Kirkland may include: Kenmore, Bothell, and Issaquah.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z