Compare-Cities.com
Compare Kirkland to Mount Vernon
This post compares Kirkland, Washington to Mount Vernon, Washington across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Kirkland (city) | Mount Vernon (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 86,772 | 33,787 |
| Income (median) | $79,458 | $40,352 |
| Home Value (median) | $522,900 | $221,000 |
| White | 76% | 71% |
| Black | 1% | 1% |
| Asian | 14% | 2% |
| With Kids | 29% | 37% |
| Age (median) | 38 | 34 |
| Rentals | 36% | 39% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Kirkland or Mount Vernon?
A: Kirkland has a larger population count than Mount Vernon: 86772 compared with 33787 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Kirkland or in Mount Vernon?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Kirkland.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Kirkland or Mount Vernon?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in Kirkland.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Mount Vernon does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 36% for Kirkland versus 39% for Mount Vernon.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Kirkland may include: Kenmore, Bothell, and Issaquah.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z