Compare-Cities.com
Compare Kirkland to Lacey
This post compares Kirkland, Washington to Lacey, Washington across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Kirkland (city) | Lacey (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 86,772 | 46,655 |
| Income (median) | $79,458 | $51,201 |
| Home Value (median) | $522,900 | $243,200 |
| White | 76% | 73% |
| Black | 1% | 5% |
| Asian | 14% | 8% |
| With Kids | 29% | 32% |
| Age (median) | 38 | 35 |
| Rentals | 36% | 45% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Kirkland or Lacey?
A: Kirkland has a larger population count than Lacey: 86772 compared with 46655 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Kirkland or in Lacey?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Kirkland.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Kirkland or Lacey?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in Kirkland.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Lacey does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 36% for Kirkland versus 45% for Lacey.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Kirkland may include: Kenmore, Bothell, and Issaquah.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z