Compare-Cities.com
Compare Kirkland to Kent
This post compares Kirkland, Washington to Kent, Washington across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Kirkland (city) | Kent (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 86,772 | 126,561 |
| Income (median) | $79,458 | $46,225 |
| Home Value (median) | $522,900 | $284,900 |
| White | 76% | 52% |
| Black | 1% | 11% |
| Asian | 14% | 20% |
| With Kids | 29% | 36% |
| Age (median) | 38 | 34 |
| Rentals | 36% | 45% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Kirkland or Kent?
A: Kirkland has a smaller population count than Kent: 86772 compared with 126561 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Kirkland or in Kent?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Kirkland.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Kirkland or Kent?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Kirkland.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Kent does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 36% for Kirkland versus 45% for Kent.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Kirkland may include: Kenmore, Bothell, and Issaquah.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z