Compare-Cities.com
Compare Kirkland to Auburn
This post compares Kirkland, Washington to Auburn, Washington across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Kirkland (city) | Auburn (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 86,772 | 77,440 |
| Income (median) | $79,458 | $49,985 |
| Home Value (median) | $522,900 | $259,600 |
| White | 76% | 68% |
| Black | 1% | 4% |
| Asian | 14% | 9% |
| With Kids | 29% | 35% |
| Age (median) | 38 | 34 |
| Rentals | 36% | 41% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Kirkland or Auburn?
A: Kirkland has a similar population count than Auburn: 86772 compared with 77440 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Kirkland or in Auburn?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Kirkland.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Kirkland or Auburn?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in Kirkland.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Auburn does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 36% for Kirkland versus 41% for Auburn.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Kirkland may include: Kenmore, Bothell, and Issaquah.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z