Compare-Cities.com
Compare Kent to Richland
This post compares Kent, Washington to Richland, Washington across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Kent (city) | Richland (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 126,561 | 53,991 |
| Income (median) | $46,225 | $60,961 |
| Home Value (median) | $284,900 | $226,300 |
| White | 52% | 83% |
| Black | 11% | 1% |
| Asian | 20% | 5% |
| With Kids | 36% | 30% |
| Age (median) | 34 | 36 |
| Rentals | 45% | 35% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Kent or Richland?
A: Kent has a larger population count than Richland: 126561 compared with 53991 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Kent or in Richland?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Kent.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Kent or Richland?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Kent.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Kent does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 45% for Kent versus 35% for Richland.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Kent may include: Renton, Federal-Way, and North-Lynnwood.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z