Compare-Cities.com
Compare Kent to Kirkland
This post compares Kent, Washington to Kirkland, Washington across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Kent (city) | Kirkland (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 126,561 | 86,772 |
| Income (median) | $46,225 | $79,458 |
| Home Value (median) | $284,900 | $522,900 |
| White | 52% | 76% |
| Black | 11% | 1% |
| Asian | 20% | 14% |
| With Kids | 36% | 29% |
| Age (median) | 34 | 38 |
| Rentals | 45% | 36% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Kent or Kirkland?
A: Kent has a larger population count than Kirkland: 126561 compared with 86772 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Kent or in Kirkland?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Kent.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Kent or Kirkland?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Kent.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Kent does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 45% for Kent versus 36% for Kirkland.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Kent may include: Renton, Federal-Way, and North-Lynnwood.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z