Compare-Cities.com
Compare Graham to Kirkland
This post compares Graham, Washington to Kirkland, Washington across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Graham (CDP) | Kirkland (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 26,939 | 86,772 |
| Income (median) | $55,343 | $79,458 |
| Home Value (median) | $244,300 | $522,900 |
| White | 83% | 76% |
| Black | 2% | 1% |
| Asian | 2% | 14% |
| With Kids | 44% | 29% |
| Age (median) | 34 | 38 |
| Rentals | 15% | 36% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Graham or Kirkland?
A: Graham has a much smaller population count than Kirkland: 26939 compared with 86772 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Graham or in Kirkland?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Graham.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Graham or Kirkland?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Graham.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Kirkland does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 15% for Graham versus 36% for Kirkland.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Graham may include: Orchards, Lake-Stevens, and Maple-Valley.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z