Compare-Cities.com
Compare Edmonds to Lacey
This post compares Edmonds, Washington to Lacey, Washington across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
Dimension | Edmonds (city) | Lacey (city) |
---|---|---|
Population | 41,309 | 46,655 |
Income (median) | $62,861 | $51,201 |
Home Value (median) | $443,800 | $243,200 |
White | 82% | 73% |
Black | 1% | 5% |
Asian | 8% | 8% |
With Kids | 23% | 32% |
Age (median) | 46 | 35 |
Rentals | 29% | 45% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Edmonds or Lacey?
A: Edmonds has a similar population count than Lacey: 41309 compared with 46655 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Edmonds or in Lacey?
A: Incomes are on average higher in Edmonds.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Edmonds or Lacey?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Edmonds.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Lacey does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 29% for Edmonds versus 45% for Lacey.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Edmonds may include: Mukilteo, Salmon-Creek, and Bainbridge-Island.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z