Compare-Cities.com
Compare Eastmont to Lacey
This post compares Eastmont, Washington to Lacey, Washington across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Eastmont (CDP) | Lacey (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 21,951 | 46,655 |
| Income (median) | $64,702 | $51,201 |
| Home Value (median) | $362,500 | $243,200 |
| White | 79% | 73% |
| Black | 2% | 5% |
| Asian | 11% | 8% |
| With Kids | 39% | 32% |
| Age (median) | 38 | 35 |
| Rentals | 13% | 45% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Eastmont or Lacey?
A: Eastmont has a much smaller population count than Lacey: 21951 compared with 46655 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Eastmont or in Lacey?
A: Incomes are on average higher in Eastmont.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Eastmont or Lacey?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Eastmont.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Lacey does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 13% for Eastmont versus 45% for Lacey.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Eastmont may include: Bothell-West, Silver-Firs, and Kenmore.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z