Compare-Cities.com
Compare Camas to Walla Walla
This post compares Camas, Washington to Walla Walla, Washington across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
Dimension | Camas (city) | Walla Walla (city) |
---|---|---|
Population | 22,086 | 32,585 |
Income (median) | $66,570 | $40,863 |
Home Value (median) | $381,500 | $178,800 |
White | 85% | 82% |
Black | 1% | 2% |
Asian | 7% | 2% |
With Kids | 46% | 27% |
Age (median) | 39 | 35 |
Rentals | 24% | 42% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Camas or Walla Walla?
A: Camas has a smaller population count than Walla Walla: 22086 compared with 32585 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Camas or in Walla Walla?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Camas.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Camas or Walla Walla?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in Camas.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Walla Walla does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 24% for Camas versus 42% for Walla Walla.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Camas may include: Maple-Valley, Eastmont, and Silver-Firs.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z