Compare-Cities.com
Compare Camas to Richland
This post compares Camas, Washington to Richland, Washington across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Camas (city) | Richland (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 22,086 | 53,991 |
| Income (median) | $66,570 | $60,961 |
| Home Value (median) | $381,500 | $226,300 |
| White | 85% | 83% |
| Black | 1% | 1% |
| Asian | 7% | 5% |
| With Kids | 46% | 30% |
| Age (median) | 39 | 36 |
| Rentals | 24% | 35% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Camas or Richland?
A: Camas has a much smaller population count than Richland: 22086 compared with 53991 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Camas or in Richland?
A: Incomes are on average similar in Camas.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Camas or Richland?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Camas.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Richland does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 24% for Camas versus 35% for Richland.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Camas may include: Maple-Valley, Eastmont, and Silver-Firs.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z