Compare-Cities.com
Compare Bothell to Lacey
This post compares Bothell, Washington to Lacey, Washington across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Bothell (city) | Lacey (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 44,082 | 46,655 |
| Income (median) | $65,557 | $51,201 |
| Home Value (median) | $414,200 | $243,200 |
| White | 71% | 73% |
| Black | 2% | 5% |
| Asian | 14% | 8% |
| With Kids | 35% | 32% |
| Age (median) | 37 | 35 |
| Rentals | 33% | 45% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Bothell or Lacey?
A: Bothell has a similar population count than Lacey: 44082 compared with 46655 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Bothell or in Lacey?
A: Incomes are on average higher in Bothell.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Bothell or Lacey?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Bothell.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Lacey does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 33% for Bothell versus 45% for Lacey.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Bothell may include: Kenmore, Kirkland, and Bothell-West.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z