Compare-Cities.com
Compare Bellingham to Richland
This post compares Bellingham, Washington to Richland, Washington across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Bellingham (city) | Richland (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 85,388 | 53,991 |
| Income (median) | $40,566 | $60,961 |
| Home Value (median) | $328,300 | $226,300 |
| White | 82% | 83% |
| Black | 1% | 1% |
| Asian | 6% | 5% |
| With Kids | 21% | 30% |
| Age (median) | 31 | 36 |
| Rentals | 54% | 35% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Bellingham or Richland?
A: Bellingham has a larger population count than Richland: 85388 compared with 53991 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Bellingham or in Richland?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Bellingham.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Bellingham or Richland?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Bellingham.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Bellingham does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 54% for Bellingham versus 35% for Richland.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Bellingham may include: Bremerton, Everett, and Olympia.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z