Compare-Cities.com
Compare Auburn to Richland
This post compares Auburn, Washington to Richland, Washington across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Auburn (city) | Richland (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 77,440 | 53,991 |
| Income (median) | $49,985 | $60,961 |
| Home Value (median) | $259,600 | $226,300 |
| White | 68% | 83% |
| Black | 4% | 1% |
| Asian | 9% | 5% |
| With Kids | 35% | 30% |
| Age (median) | 34 | 36 |
| Rentals | 41% | 35% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Auburn or Richland?
A: Auburn has a larger population count than Richland: 77440 compared with 53991 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Auburn or in Richland?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Auburn.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Auburn or Richland?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Auburn.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Auburn does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 41% for Auburn versus 35% for Richland.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Auburn may include: Lacey, Mountlake-Terrace, and Mount-Vernon.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z