Compare-Cities.com
Compare Auburn to Kirkland
This post compares Auburn, Washington to Kirkland, Washington across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Auburn (city) | Kirkland (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 77,440 | 86,772 |
| Income (median) | $49,985 | $79,458 |
| Home Value (median) | $259,600 | $522,900 |
| White | 68% | 76% |
| Black | 4% | 1% |
| Asian | 9% | 14% |
| With Kids | 35% | 29% |
| Age (median) | 34 | 38 |
| Rentals | 41% | 36% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Auburn or Kirkland?
A: Auburn has a similar population count than Kirkland: 77440 compared with 86772 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Auburn or in Kirkland?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Auburn.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Auburn or Kirkland?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Auburn.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Auburn does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 41% for Auburn versus 36% for Kirkland.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Auburn may include: Lacey, Mountlake-Terrace, and Mount-Vernon.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z