Compare-Cities.com
Compare Wichita Falls to Sugar Land
This post compares Wichita Falls, Texas to Sugar Land, Texas across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Wichita Falls (city) | Sugar Land (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 104,621 | 86,886 |
| Income (median) | $34,848 | $71,980 |
| Home Value (median) | $96,700 | $292,700 |
| White | 75% | 50% |
| Black | 12% | 6% |
| Asian | 2% | 39% |
| With Kids | 33% | 38% |
| Age (median) | 32 | 41 |
| Rentals | 43% | 19% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Wichita Falls or Sugar Land?
A: Wichita Falls has a similar population count than Sugar Land: 104621 compared with 86886 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Wichita Falls or in Sugar Land?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Wichita Falls.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Wichita Falls or Sugar Land?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Wichita Falls.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Wichita Falls does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 43% for Wichita Falls versus 19% for Sugar Land.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Wichita Falls may include: Abilene, Sherman, and Temple.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z