Compare-Cities.com
Compare Wichita Falls to Southlake
This post compares Wichita Falls, Texas to Southlake, Texas across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Wichita Falls (city) | Southlake (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 104,621 | 30,090 |
| Income (median) | $34,848 | $134,654 |
| Home Value (median) | $96,700 | $627,700 |
| White | 75% | 83% |
| Black | 12% | 2% |
| Asian | 2% | 10% |
| With Kids | 33% | 53% |
| Age (median) | 32 | 42 |
| Rentals | 43% | 7% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Wichita Falls or Southlake?
A: Wichita Falls has a larger population count than Southlake: 104621 compared with 30090 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Wichita Falls or in Southlake?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Wichita Falls.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Wichita Falls or Southlake?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Wichita Falls.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Wichita Falls does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 43% for Wichita Falls versus 7% for Southlake.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Wichita Falls may include: Abilene, Sherman, and Temple.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z