Compare-Cities.com
Compare Wichita Falls to Pasadena
This post compares Wichita Falls, Texas to Pasadena, Texas across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
Dimension | Wichita Falls (city) | Pasadena (city) |
---|---|---|
Population | 104,621 | 153,909 |
Income (median) | $34,848 | $39,894 |
Home Value (median) | $96,700 | $108,700 |
White | 75% | 85% |
Black | 12% | 2% |
Asian | 2% | 1% |
With Kids | 33% | 44% |
Age (median) | 32 | 31 |
Rentals | 43% | 46% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Wichita Falls or Pasadena?
A: Wichita Falls has a smaller population count than Pasadena: 104621 compared with 153909 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Wichita Falls or in Pasadena?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Wichita Falls.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Wichita Falls or Pasadena?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Wichita Falls.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Pasadena does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 43% for Wichita Falls versus 46% for Pasadena.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Wichita Falls may include: Abilene, Sherman, and Temple.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z