Compare-Cities.com
Compare Wichita Falls to North Richland Hills
This post compares Wichita Falls, Texas to North Richland Hills, Texas across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Wichita Falls (city) | North Richland Hills (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 104,621 | 69,039 |
| Income (median) | $34,848 | $47,417 |
| Home Value (median) | $96,700 | $171,200 |
| White | 75% | 82% |
| Black | 12% | 5% |
| Asian | 2% | 4% |
| With Kids | 33% | 32% |
| Age (median) | 32 | 37 |
| Rentals | 43% | 37% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Wichita Falls or North Richland Hills?
A: Wichita Falls has a larger population count than North Richland Hills: 104621 compared with 69039 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Wichita Falls or in North Richland Hills?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Wichita Falls.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Wichita Falls or North Richland Hills?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Wichita Falls.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Wichita Falls does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 43% for Wichita Falls versus 37% for North Richland Hills.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Wichita Falls may include: Abilene, Sherman, and Temple.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z