Compare-Cities.com
Compare Sugar Land to Wichita Falls
This post compares Sugar Land, Texas to Wichita Falls, Texas across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Sugar Land (city) | Wichita Falls (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 86,886 | 104,621 |
| Income (median) | $71,980 | $34,848 |
| Home Value (median) | $292,700 | $96,700 |
| White | 50% | 75% |
| Black | 6% | 12% |
| Asian | 39% | 2% |
| With Kids | 38% | 33% |
| Age (median) | 41 | 32 |
| Rentals | 19% | 43% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Sugar Land or Wichita Falls?
A: Sugar Land has a similar population count than Wichita Falls: 86886 compared with 104621 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Sugar Land or in Wichita Falls?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Sugar Land.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Sugar Land or Wichita Falls?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in Sugar Land.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Wichita Falls does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 19% for Sugar Land versus 43% for Wichita Falls.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Sugar Land may include: Coppell, Murphy, and Plano.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z