Compare-Cities.com
Compare Sugar Land to Southlake
This post compares Sugar Land, Texas to Southlake, Texas across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Sugar Land (city) | Southlake (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 86,886 | 30,090 |
| Income (median) | $71,980 | $134,654 |
| Home Value (median) | $292,700 | $627,700 |
| White | 50% | 83% |
| Black | 6% | 2% |
| Asian | 39% | 10% |
| With Kids | 38% | 53% |
| Age (median) | 41 | 42 |
| Rentals | 19% | 7% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Sugar Land or Southlake?
A: Sugar Land has a larger population count than Southlake: 86886 compared with 30090 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Sugar Land or in Southlake?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Sugar Land.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Sugar Land or Southlake?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Sugar Land.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Sugar Land does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 19% for Sugar Land versus 7% for Southlake.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Sugar Land may include: Coppell, Murphy, and Plano.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z