Compare-Cities.com
Compare Sugar Land to North Richland Hills
This post compares Sugar Land, Texas to North Richland Hills, Texas across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Sugar Land (city) | North Richland Hills (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 86,886 | 69,039 |
| Income (median) | $71,980 | $47,417 |
| Home Value (median) | $292,700 | $171,200 |
| White | 50% | 82% |
| Black | 6% | 5% |
| Asian | 39% | 4% |
| With Kids | 38% | 32% |
| Age (median) | 41 | 37 |
| Rentals | 19% | 37% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Sugar Land or North Richland Hills?
A: Sugar Land has a larger population count than North Richland Hills: 86886 compared with 69039 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Sugar Land or in North Richland Hills?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Sugar Land.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Sugar Land or North Richland Hills?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Sugar Land.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: North Richland Hills does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 19% for Sugar Land versus 37% for North Richland Hills.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Sugar Land may include: Coppell, Murphy, and Plano.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z