Compare-Cities.com
Compare Sugar Land to Midlothian
This post compares Sugar Land, Texas to Midlothian, Texas across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Sugar Land (city) | Midlothian (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 86,886 | 22,615 |
| Income (median) | $71,980 | $53,594 |
| Home Value (median) | $292,700 | $170,800 |
| White | 50% | 88% |
| Black | 6% | 4% |
| Asian | 39% | 0% |
| With Kids | 38% | 46% |
| Age (median) | 41 | 33 |
| Rentals | 19% | 24% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Sugar Land or Midlothian?
A: Sugar Land has a larger population count than Midlothian: 86886 compared with 22615 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Sugar Land or in Midlothian?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Sugar Land.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Sugar Land or Midlothian?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Sugar Land.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Midlothian does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 19% for Sugar Land versus 24% for Midlothian.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Sugar Land may include: Coppell, Murphy, and Plano.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z