Compare-Cities.com
Compare Southlake to Sugar Land
This post compares Southlake, Texas to Sugar Land, Texas across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Southlake (city) | Sugar Land (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 30,090 | 86,886 |
| Income (median) | $134,654 | $71,980 |
| Home Value (median) | $627,700 | $292,700 |
| White | 83% | 50% |
| Black | 2% | 6% |
| Asian | 10% | 39% |
| With Kids | 53% | 38% |
| Age (median) | 42 | 41 |
| Rentals | 7% | 19% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Southlake or Sugar Land?
A: Southlake has a much smaller population count than Sugar Land: 30090 compared with 86886 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Southlake or in Sugar Land?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Southlake.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Southlake or Sugar Land?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in Southlake.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Sugar Land does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 7% for Southlake versus 19% for Sugar Land.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Southlake may include: Colleyville, Keller, and The-Woodlands.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z