Compare-Cities.com
Compare Southlake to North Richland Hills
This post compares Southlake, Texas to North Richland Hills, Texas across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Southlake (city) | North Richland Hills (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 30,090 | 69,039 |
| Income (median) | $134,654 | $47,417 |
| Home Value (median) | $627,700 | $171,200 |
| White | 83% | 82% |
| Black | 2% | 5% |
| Asian | 10% | 4% |
| With Kids | 53% | 32% |
| Age (median) | 42 | 37 |
| Rentals | 7% | 37% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Southlake or North Richland Hills?
A: Southlake has a much smaller population count than North Richland Hills: 30090 compared with 69039 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Southlake or in North Richland Hills?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Southlake.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Southlake or North Richland Hills?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in Southlake.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: North Richland Hills does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 7% for Southlake versus 37% for North Richland Hills.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Southlake may include: Colleyville, Keller, and The-Woodlands.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z