Compare-Cities.com
Compare San Marcos to Sugar Land
This post compares San Marcos, Texas to Sugar Land, Texas across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | San Marcos (city) | Sugar Land (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 59,935 | 86,886 |
| Income (median) | $33,697 | $71,980 |
| Home Value (median) | $153,000 | $292,700 |
| White | 84% | 50% |
| Black | 5% | 6% |
| Asian | 2% | 39% |
| With Kids | 20% | 38% |
| Age (median) | 23 | 41 |
| Rentals | 72% | 19% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, San Marcos or Sugar Land?
A: San Marcos has a smaller population count than Sugar Land: 59935 compared with 86886 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in San Marcos or in Sugar Land?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in San Marcos.
Q: Are homes more expensive in San Marcos or Sugar Land?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in San Marcos.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: San Marcos does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 72% for San Marcos versus 19% for Sugar Land.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to San Marcos may include: College-Station, Kingsville, and Nacogdoches.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z