Compare-Cities.com
Compare Port Arthur to North Richland Hills
This post compares Port Arthur, Texas to North Richland Hills, Texas across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Port Arthur (city) | North Richland Hills (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 55,177 | 69,039 |
| Income (median) | $35,225 | $47,417 |
| Home Value (median) | $64,300 | $171,200 |
| White | 49% | 82% |
| Black | 39% | 5% |
| Asian | 6% | 4% |
| With Kids | 35% | 32% |
| Age (median) | 33 | 37 |
| Rentals | 43% | 37% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Port Arthur or North Richland Hills?
A: Port Arthur has a similar population count than North Richland Hills: 55177 compared with 69039 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Port Arthur or in North Richland Hills?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Port Arthur.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Port Arthur or North Richland Hills?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Port Arthur.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Port Arthur does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 43% for Port Arthur versus 37% for North Richland Hills.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Port Arthur may include: Beaumont, Marshall, and Texarkana.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z