Compare-Cities.com
Compare North Richland Hills to Wichita Falls
This post compares North Richland Hills, Texas to Wichita Falls, Texas across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | North Richland Hills (city) | Wichita Falls (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 69,039 | 104,621 |
| Income (median) | $47,417 | $34,848 |
| Home Value (median) | $171,200 | $96,700 |
| White | 82% | 75% |
| Black | 5% | 12% |
| Asian | 4% | 2% |
| With Kids | 32% | 33% |
| Age (median) | 37 | 32 |
| Rentals | 37% | 43% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, North Richland Hills or Wichita Falls?
A: North Richland Hills has a smaller population count than Wichita Falls: 69039 compared with 104621 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in North Richland Hills or in Wichita Falls?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in North Richland Hills.
Q: Are homes more expensive in North Richland Hills or Wichita Falls?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in North Richland Hills.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Wichita Falls does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 37% for North Richland Hills versus 43% for Wichita Falls.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to North Richland Hills may include: Hurst, Lake-Jackson, and La-Porte.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z