Compare-Cities.com
Compare North Richland Hills to Southlake
This post compares North Richland Hills, Texas to Southlake, Texas across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | North Richland Hills (city) | Southlake (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 69,039 | 30,090 |
| Income (median) | $47,417 | $134,654 |
| Home Value (median) | $171,200 | $627,700 |
| White | 82% | 83% |
| Black | 5% | 2% |
| Asian | 4% | 10% |
| With Kids | 32% | 53% |
| Age (median) | 37 | 42 |
| Rentals | 37% | 7% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, North Richland Hills or Southlake?
A: North Richland Hills has a larger population count than Southlake: 69039 compared with 30090 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in North Richland Hills or in Southlake?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in North Richland Hills.
Q: Are homes more expensive in North Richland Hills or Southlake?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in North Richland Hills.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: North Richland Hills does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 37% for North Richland Hills versus 7% for Southlake.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to North Richland Hills may include: Hurst, Lake-Jackson, and La-Porte.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z