Compare-Cities.com
Compare North Richland Hills to Pasadena
This post compares North Richland Hills, Texas to Pasadena, Texas across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
Dimension | North Richland Hills (city) | Pasadena (city) |
---|---|---|
Population | 69,039 | 153,909 |
Income (median) | $47,417 | $39,894 |
Home Value (median) | $171,200 | $108,700 |
White | 82% | 85% |
Black | 5% | 2% |
Asian | 4% | 1% |
With Kids | 32% | 44% |
Age (median) | 37 | 31 |
Rentals | 37% | 46% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, North Richland Hills or Pasadena?
A: North Richland Hills has a much smaller population count than Pasadena: 69039 compared with 153909 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in North Richland Hills or in Pasadena?
A: Incomes are on average higher in North Richland Hills.
Q: Are homes more expensive in North Richland Hills or Pasadena?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in North Richland Hills.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Pasadena does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 37% for North Richland Hills versus 46% for Pasadena.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to North Richland Hills may include: Hurst, Lake-Jackson, and La-Porte.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z